[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/8] x86/AMD: Do not intercept access to performance counters MSRs
>>> On 09.04.13 at 19:26, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > @@ -138,6 +139,36 @@ static inline u32 get_fam15h_addr(u32 addr) > return addr; > } > > +static void amd_vpmu_set_msr_bitmap(struct vcpu *v) > +{ > + int i; Please, here and elsewhere, use unsigned int for variables used as array index, unless some specific use requires them to be signed. Jan > + struct vpmu_struct *vpmu = vcpu_vpmu(v); > + struct amd_vpmu_context *ctxt = vpmu->context; > + > + for ( i = 0; i < num_counters; i++ ) > + { > + svm_intercept_msr(v, counters[i], MSR_INTERCEPT_NONE); > + svm_intercept_msr(v, ctrls[i], MSR_INTERCEPT_WRITE); > + } > + > + ctxt->msr_bitmap_set = 1; > +} _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |