[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] XSA-36 patch for xen-3.4

To: Momu G <momug31@xxxxxxxxx>
From: Matt Wilson <msw@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 16:41:05 -0700
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 23:42:05 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 04:23:00PM -0700, Momu G wrote:
> Hi Matt,
> 
> I am asking for Xen-3.4 which is greater than Xen-3.3. OR are you saying
> Xen-3.4 is not vulnerable? Please help.

Ah, sorry. I misread your request. You're asking for a backport of the
patch. You're right that the Xen 4.1 version doesn't apply cleanly. It
looks like a bit of work to get it back ported.

Matt

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- Re: [Xen-devel] XSA-36 patch for xen-3.4
  - From: Matt Wilson
- Re: [Xen-devel] XSA-36 patch for xen-3.4
  - From: Momu G

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 10/18 V2]: PVH xen: introduce vmx_pvh.c and pvh.c
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 10/18 V2]: PVH xen: introduce vmx_pvh.c and pvh.c
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] XSA-36 patch for xen-3.4
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 17473: tolerable FAIL
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.