[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 16788: regressions - FAIL

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 16:31:58 +0000
Cc: "Tim \(Xen.org\)" <tim@xxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 16:32:22 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 16788: regressions - 
FAIL"):
> So this (and presumably other Windows failures too) is apparently
> a regression from 703ac3abcfc5f649c038070867ee12c67f730548
> ("x86: introduce create_perdomain_mapping()"), running into
> emulate_map_dest()'s

FYI indeed the bisector looks like it's going to finger 703ac3.  It's
just making sure...

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 16788: regressions - FAIL
  - From: xen . org
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 16788: regressions - FAIL
  - From: Jan Beulich

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] [blkback] blkback statistic counters are signed values
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 16788: regressions - FAIL
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 16788: regressions - FAIL
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.2-testing test] 16791: regressions - FAIL
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.