|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] PATastic fun
On 26.02.2013 18:03, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 04:32:37PM +0100, Stefan Bader wrote:
>> On 25.02.2013 10:10, Stefan Bader wrote:
>>> On 25.02.2013 04:15, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
>>>> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 02:54:16PM +0100, Stefan Bader wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Konrad,
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey Stefan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> here is another one from the hm-what? department:
>>>>>
>>>>> Heh - the really good-bug-hunting one. Lets also include Jinsong as
>>>>> he has been tracking a similar one with mcelog.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Colin discovered that running the attached program with the fork
>>>>>> active (e.g. "./mmap-example -f 0x10000", the address can be that or
>>>>>> iomem) this triggers the following weird messages:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ 6824.453724] mmap-example:3481 map pfn expected mapping type
>>>>>> write-back for [mem 0x00010000-0x00010fff], got uncached-minus
>>>>>> [ 6824.453776] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>>>>> [ 6824.453796] WARNING: at
>>>>>> /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/arch/x86/mm/pat.c:774
>>>>>> untrack_pfn+0xb8/0xd0() ... [ 6824.453920] Pid: 3481, comm:
>>>>>> mmap-example Tainted: GF
>>>>>> 3.8.0-6-generic #13-Ubuntu
>>>>>> [ 6824.453926] Call Trace:
>>>>>> [ 6824.453944] [<ffffffff8105879f>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0
>>>>>> [ 6824.453954] [<ffffffff810587fa>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
>>>>>> [ 6824.453963] [<ffffffff8104bcc8>] untrack_pfn+0xb8/0xd0
>>>>>> [ 6824.453975] [<ffffffff81156c1c>] unmap_single_vma+0xac/0x100
>>>>>> [ 6824.453985] [<ffffffff81157459>] unmap_vmas+0x49/0x90
>>>>>> [ 6824.453995] [<ffffffff8115f808>] exit_mmap+0x98/0x170
>>>>>> [ 6824.454007] [<ffffffff810559a4>] mmput+0x64/0x100
>>>>>> [ 6824.454017] [<ffffffff810560f5>] dup_mm+0x445/0x660
>>>>>> [ 6824.454027] [<ffffffff81056d9f>]
>>>>>> copy_process.part.22+0xa5f/0x1510 [ 6824.454038]
>>>>>> [<ffffffff81057931>] do_fork+0x91/0x350 [ 6824.454048]
>>>>>> [<ffffffff81057c76>] sys_clone+0x16/0x20 [ 6824.454060]
>>>>>> [<ffffffff816ccbf9>] stub_clone+0x69/0x90 [ 6824.454069]
>>>>>> [<ffffffff816cc89d>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f [ 6824.454076]
>>>>>> ---[ end trace 4918cdd0a4c9fea4 ]---
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I found that this is related to your bandaid patch
>>>>>>
>>>>>> commit 8eaffa67b43e99ae581622c5133e20b0f48bcef1
>>>>>> Author: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Date: Fri Feb 10 09:16:27 2012 -0500
>>>>>>
>>>>>> xen/pat: Disable PAT support for now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just do not understand how this happens. From the trace it seems
>>>>>> the fork
>>>>>> fails when duplicating the VMAs (dup_mm calls mmput on failure). So
>>>>>> maybe the
>>>>>> warning is just related to this. So primarily the question is how on
>>>>>> fork the _PAGE_PCD bit can become set? That and _PAGE_PWT are
>>>>>> cleared from the supported
>>>>>> mask by the patch, so somehow I would think nothing should be able
>>>>>> to set it...
>>>>>> But apparently not so.
>>>>>> Not sure it is a big deal since I never saw this in normal operation
>>>>>> and it
>>>>>> seems to be ok when unapping before doing the fork. It is just plain
>>>>>> odd.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jinsong mentioned that there is some oddity with the MTRR. Somehow the
>>>>> ranges are swapped or not correct. Jinsong, could you shed some light
>>>>> on what you have found so far?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, Sander once also reported a similar weird warning when start mcelog
>>>> daemon, as attached.
>>>>
>>>> Basically, it occurs when mcelog user daemon start,
>>>> do_fork
>>>> --> copy_process
>>>> --> dup_mm
>>>> --> dup_mmap
>>>> --> copy_page_range
>>>> --> track_pfn_copy
>>>> --> reserve_pfn_range
>>
>> So that makes it clearer as this will do
>>
>> reserve_memtype(...)
>> --> pat_x_mtrr_type
>> --> mtrr_type_lookup
>> --> __mtrr_type_lookup
>>
>> And that can return -1/0xff in case of mtrr not being enabled/initialized.
>> Which
>> is not the case (given there are no messages for it in dmesg). This is not
>> equal
>> to MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK and thus becomes _PAGE_CACHE_UC_MINUS.
>>
>> It looks like the problem starts early in reserve_memtype:
>>
>> if (!pat_enabled) {
>> /* This is identical to page table setting without PAT */
>> if (new_type) {
>> if (req_type == _PAGE_CACHE_WC)
>> *new_type = _PAGE_CACHE_UC_MINUS;
>> else
>> *new_type = req_type & _PAGE_CACHE_MASK;
>> }
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> This would be what we want, but only clearing the PWT and PCD flags from the
>> supported flags is not changing pat_enabled (which is 1 when PAT support is
>> compiled into the kernel). Unfortunately the variable is local and since
>> there
>> are not any messages about PAT in dmesg I would say pat_init() is not called
>> either. Which might be used to disable PAT support by clearing the CPU
>> feature
>> flag.
>
> Hm, so:
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> index 39928d1..9ac70c5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> @@ -379,6 +379,7 @@ static void __init xen_init_cpuid_mask(void)
>
> cpuid_leaf1_edx_mask =
> ~((1 << X86_FEATURE_MTRR) | /* disable MTRR */
> + (1 << X86_FEATURE_PAT) | /* disable PAT */
> (1 << X86_FEATURE_ACC)); /* thermal monitoring */
>
> if (!xen_initial_domain())
>
>
>
> should do it right? Let me check on the troublesome machine I saw
> it.
>
I could try it as well but somehow my reading of pat_init() is that if that
would have been called at all, there should be some message about PAT in dmesg.
And normal dom0 boots do not show anything.
It looks like pat_init only gets called from two places in mtrr code, and that
probably is not done in dom0 either. So clearing the feature is one step, but I
would think that also there needs to be a call to pat_init...
-Stefan
Attachment:
signature.asc _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |