Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00 of 11 v3] NUMA aware credit scheduling

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 08:11 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 18.02.13 at 18:13, Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>  * [ 2/11] xen, libxc: introduce node maps and masks
> >>
> > Jan, are you ok with the changes I made, as a consequence of your
> > comments to v2 ?
> 
> Yes, I am. But I won't ack a mixed tools/hypervisor patch. And
> the hypervisor part that's left is so obvious that I don't see it
> needing an ack on its own.

I don't see any problem with acking a patch which is obvious, in general
I think it is better to be explicit, especially where multiple
maintainers involved, lest we all be waiting for each other.

You could say "I would ack this, but it is obvious" but it seems to me
it would be quicker to just say "ack" ;-)

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel