Re: [Xen-devel] Unstable NFS mount at heavy load.

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:50:08AM +0800, G.R. wrote:
> Hi Konrad, do you have any suggestion how to debug?

Is your dom0 32-bit or 64-bit? And what kind of network card are you
using for the NFS traffic?

> 
> Thanks,
> Timothy
> 
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:47 PM, G.R. <firemeteor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Konrad,
> > Do you have any suggestion how to troubleshooting the NFS mount issue
> > as described below?
> > The broken connection is quite suspicious to me.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Timothy
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Stefano Stabellini
> > <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Do you mean the maintainer of the Linux PV network frontend and backend
> >> drivers (netfront and netback)?
> >> That would be Konrad.
> >>
> >> On Tue, 8 Jan 2013, G.R. wrote:
> >>> Nobody responses...
> >>>
> >>> Stefano, could you point me to the PVNET owner?
> >>> I suspect this has something to do with the net emulation.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Timothy
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 1:12 PM, G.R. <firemeteor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > Forward this to the devel list.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >>> > From: G.R. <firemeteor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> > Date: Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 1:12 AM
> >>> > Subject: Unstable NFS mount at heavy load.
> >>> > To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > I was running benchmark on IO performance using iozone3.
> >>> > In my build, the dom0 resides on a small usb stick and all the storage
> >>> > comes from a NFS mount.
> >>> > I test NFS performance on both dom0 && domU, mounting from the same 
> >>> > server.
> >>> >
> >>> > The dom0 test works just well, but the domU run suffers from unstable 
> >>> > NFS mount.
> >>> > Since this is a NFS root, the domU just appear to be freezed.
> >>> >
> >>> > The log from both end of the NFS mount shows that the connection is 
> >>> > broken:
> >>> > Note that the client time stamp is about 20 seconds ahead of server.
> >>> >
> >>> > From the domU (client end):
> >>> > Jan  4 23:31:16 debvm kernel: [  371.008142] nfs: server 192.168.1.8
> >>> > not responding, still trying //(once)
> >>> > Jan  4 23:31:25 debvm kernel: [  379.928142] nfs: server 192.168.1.8
> >>> > not responding, still trying //(28 times within the same second)
> >>> > Jan  4 23:31:26 debvm kernel: [  381.396143] nfs: server 192.168.1.8
> >>> > not responding, still trying //(once)
> >>> > Jan  4 23:31:44 debvm kernel: [  399.452129] nfs: server 192.168.1.8
> >>> > not responding, still trying //(14 times within the same second)
> >>> > Jan  4 23:31:45 debvm kernel: [  399.524210] nfs: server 192.168.1.8
> >>> > not responding, still trying //(15 times within the same second)
> >>> > Jan  4 23:31:46 debvm kernel: [  400.964142] nfs: server 192.168.1.8
> >>> > not responding, still trying //(once)
> >>> > Jan  4 23:31:55 debvm kernel: [  410.468787] nfs: server 192.168.1.8
> >>> > OK                                     //(25 times within the same
> >>> > second)
> >>> > Jan  4 23:31:56 debvm kernel: [  410.520202] nfs: server 192.168.1.8
> >>> > OK                                     //(32 times within the same
> >>> > second)
> >>> > Jan  4 23:32:05 debvm kernel: [  420.208141] nfs: server 192.168.1.8
> >>> > not responding, still trying //(21 times within the same second)
> >>> > Jan  4 23:32:09 debvm kernel: [  424.367613] nfs: server 192.168.1.8
> >>> > OK                                     //(25 times within the same
> >>> > second)
> >>> > Jan  4 23:32:11 debvm kernel: [  425.764143] nfs: server 192.168.1.8
> >>> > not responding, still trying
> >>> > Jan  4 23:32:11 debvm kernel: [  425.772031] nfs: server 192.168.1.8 OK
> >>> > Jan  4 23:32:11 debvm kernel: [  426.466328] nfs: server 192.168.1.8 OK
> >>> > Jan  4 23:33:32 debvm kernel: [  507.136150] nfs: server 192.168.1.8
> >>> > not responding, still trying
> >>> > Jan  4 23:34:20 debvm kernel: [  555.170556] nfs: server 192.168.1.8
> >>> > not responding, still trying
> >>> > Jan  4 23:37:28 debvm kernel: [  742.616155] nfs: server 192.168.1.8
> >>> > not responding, still trying
> >>> > Jan  4 23:39:39 debvm kernel: [  873.880200] nfs: server 192.168.1.8
> >>> > not responding, still trying
> >>> > Jan  4 23:40:15 debvm kernel: [  909.987313] nfs: server 192.168.1.8
> >>> > OK                                    //(91 times within the same
> >>> > second)
> >>> > Jan  4 23:40:27 debvm kernel: [  921.776152] nfs: server 192.168.1.8
> >>> > not responding, still trying
> >>> > Jan  4 23:40:34 debvm kernel: [  929.314639] nfs: server 192.168.1.8 OK
> >>> > Jan  4 23:42:05 debvm kernel: [ 1019.584149] nfs: server 192.168.1.8
> >>> > not responding, still trying
> >>> > Jan  4 23:42:13 debvm kernel: [ 1028.504158] nfs: server 192.168.1.8
> >>> > not responding, still trying
> >>> > Jan  4 23:42:53 debvm kernel: [ 1067.565487] nfs: server 192.168.1.8
> >>> > not responding, still trying
> >>> > Jan  4 23:44:28 debvm kernel: [ 1163.368977] nfs: server 192.168.1.8 OK
> >>> > Jan  4 23:44:33 debvm kernel: [ 1168.337859] nfs: server 192.168.1.8 OK
> >>> > Jan  4 23:45:41 debvm kernel: [ 1236.448135] nfs: server 192.168.1.8
> >>> > not responding, still trying
> >>> > Jan  4 23:49:37 debvm kernel: [ 1471.960302] nfs: server 192.168.1.8
> >>> > not responding, still trying
> >>> > Jan  4 23:51:00 debvm kernel: [ 1554.982479] nfs: server 192.168.1.8 OK
> >>> >
> >>> > From the server side:
> >>> > Jan  4 23:31:33 Hasim kernel: rpc-srv/tcp: nfsd: got error -104 when
> >>> > sending 140 bytes - shutting down socket
> >>> > Jan  4 23:31:33 Hasim kernel: nfsd: peername failed (err 107)!
> >>> > Jan  4 23:39:50 Hasim kernel: rpc-srv/tcp: nfsd: got error -104 when
> >>> > sending 140 bytes - shutting down socket
> >>> > Jan  4 23:39:50 Hasim kernel: nfsd: peername failed (err 107)!
> >>> > Jan  4 23:39:50 Hasim kernel: nfsd: peername failed (err 107)!
> >>> > Jan  4 23:40:10 Hasim kernel: rpc-srv/tcp: nfsd: got error -104 when
> >>> > sending 140 bytes - shutting down socket
> >>> > Jan  4 23:44:01 Hasim kernel: rpc-srv/tcp: nfsd: got error -104 when
> >>> > sending 140 bytes - shutting down socket
> >>> > Jan  4 23:44:01 Hasim kernel: net_ratelimit: 11 callbacks suppressed
> >>> > Jan  4 23:44:01 Hasim kernel: nfsd: peername failed (err 107)!
> >>> > Jan  4 23:50:38 Hasim kernel: rpc-srv/tcp: nfsd: got error -104 when
> >>> > sending 140 bytes - shutting down socket
> >>> > Jan  4 23:50:38 Hasim kernel: nfsd: peername failed (err 107)!
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Any suggestion how to debug this issue?
> >>> > My xen version is 4.2.1, domU kernel is at 3.6.9, the domU is PVHVM.
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks,
> >>> > Timothy
> >>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel