|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable] [qemu-xen] pci passthrough msi-x returns same pirq
On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Friday, December 7, 2012, 6:24:10 PM, you wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> >> Hi Stefano / Anthony,
> >>
> >> With the debug output turned on i see some difference between
> >> qemu-traditional and qemu-upstream:
> >>
> >> With the pci passthroughed device that fails with msi-x, in qemu-xen it
> >> seems to get the same pirq back for every entry
> >>
> >> in qemu-traditional:
> >>
> >> pt_msix_update_one: pt_msix_update_one requested pirq = 87
> >> pt_msix_update_one: Update msix entry 0 with pirq 57 gvec 0
> >> pt_msix_update_one: pt_msix_update_one requested pirq = 86
> >> pt_msix_update_one: Update msix entry 1 with pirq 56 gvec 0
> >> pt_msix_update_one: pt_msix_update_one requested pirq = 85
> >> pt_msix_update_one: Update msix entry 2 with pirq 55 gvec 0
> >> pt_msix_update_one: pt_msix_update_one requested pirq = 84
> >> pt_msix_update_one: Update msix entry 3 with pirq 54 gvec 0
> >>
> >>
> >> in qemu-xen (upstream):
> >>
> >> [00:05.0] msi_msix_setup: requested pirq 4 for MSI-X (vec: 0, entry: 0)
> >> [00:05.0] msi_msix_update: Updating MSI-X with pirq 4 gvec 0 gflags 0x3057
> >> (entry: 0)
> >> [00:05.0] msi_msix_setup: requested pirq 4 for MSI-X (vec: 0, entry: 0x1)
> >> [00:05.0] msi_msix_update: Updating MSI-X with pirq 4 gvec 0 gflags 0x3056
> >> (entry: 0x1)
> >> [00:05.0] msi_msix_setup: requested pirq 4 for MSI-X (vec: 0, entry: 0x2)
> >> [00:05.0] msi_msix_update: Updating MSI-X with pirq 4 gvec 0 gflags 0x3055
> >> (entry: 0x2)
> >> [00:05.0] msi_msix_setup: requested pirq 4 for MSI-X (vec: 0, entry: 0x3)
> >> [00:05.0] msi_msix_update: Updating MSI-X with pirq 4 gvec 0 gflags 0x3054
> >> (entry: 0x3)
>
> > That is a good pointer, but unfortunately the code that parses those
> > entries look exactly alike in both QEMU trees:
>
> > qemu-xen-traditional/hw/pt-msi.c:pt_msix_update_one
>
> > if (!gvec) {
> > /* if gvec is 0, the guest is asking for a particular pirq that
> > * is passed as dest_id */
> > pirq = ((gaddr >> 32) & 0xffffff00) |
> > (((gaddr & 0xffffffff) >> MSI_TARGET_CPU_SHIFT) & 0xff);
>
>
>
> > qemu-xen/hw/xen_pt_msi.c:msi_msix_setup
>
> > if (gvec == 0) {
> > /* if gvec is 0, the guest is asking for a particular pirq that
> > * is passed as dest_id */
> > *ppirq = msi_ext_dest_id(addr >> 32) | msi_dest_id(addr);
>
> > given how msi_ext_dest_id and msi_dest_id are defined, they should
> > behave the same way.
>
> > Maybe adding a printk in msi_msix_setup to show addr would help
> > nonetheless...
>
> Hi Stefano,
>
> I have added some printk's attached i have:
>
> - qemu-upstream.log boot of the guest with qemu upstream, device
> not working
> - qemu-traditional.log boot of the same guest with qemu traditional,
> device is working
>
> - xl-dmesg-upstream.txt part of xl-dmesg related to boot of guest with
> qemu-upstream
> - xl-dmesg-traditional.txt part of xl-dmesg related to boot of sameguest
> with qemu-traditional
> - xl-dmesg.txt complete xl-dmesg
>
> - interrupts-dom0.txt /proc/interrupts of dom0
> - interrupts-upstream.txt /proc/interrupts of guest with qemu-upstream
Thank you very much!
Could it be that the error is just due to a typo?
---
diff --git a/hw/xen_pt_msi.c b/hw/xen_pt_msi.c
index 6807672..db757cd 100644
--- a/hw/xen_pt_msi.c
+++ b/hw/xen_pt_msi.c
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ static int xen_pt_msix_update_one(XenPCIPassthroughState
*s, int entry_nr)
pirq = entry->pirq;
- rc = msi_msix_setup(s, entry->data, entry->data, &pirq, true, entry_nr,
+ rc = msi_msix_setup(s, entry->addr, entry->data, &pirq, true, entry_nr,
entry->pirq == XEN_PT_UNASSIGNED_PIRQ);
if (rc) {
return rc;
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |