Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: reserve next two XENMEM_ op numbers for future/out-of-tree use

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 07.12.12 at 16:15, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 28/11/2012 22:03, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> xen: reserve next two XENMEM_ op numbers for future/out-of-tree use
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> There was some discussion on whether these numbers should just have
> XENMEM_reserved_oracle_{1,2} definitions, or similar. Or even just reserved
> by a header comment. Does anyone have any strong opinions?

I think if it's known what they're for, calling them by their names
should be quite fine.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel