[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/ucode: Improve error handling and container file processing on AMD

To: "Boris Ostrovsky" <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxx>
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 15:08:28 +0000
Cc: Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx, Christoph_Egger@xxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 15:09:15 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

>>> On 07.12.12 at 14:46, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Do we really need what microcode_init() does?

Oh yes, absolutely. How else would boot time microcode loading
work for secondary CPUs without this? Note that the notifier only
deals with the CPU_DEAD case.

Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/ucode: Improve error handling and container file processing on AMD
  - From: Boris Ostrovsky

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/ucode: Improve error handling and container file processing on AMD
  - From: Boris Ostrovsky
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/ucode: Improve error handling and container file processing on AMD
  - From: Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/ucode: Improve error handling and container file processing on AMD
  - From: Boris Ostrovsky

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-unstable test] 14594: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] scheduler: fix rate limit range checking
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/ucode: Improve error handling and container file processing on AMD
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/ucode: Improve error handling and container file processing on AMD
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.