Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: use qemu-xen (upstream QEMU) as device model by default

[Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Monday, December 3, 2012, 5:24:43 PM, you wrote:

> On 27/11/12 16:17, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c
>> index 9d20086..c40f597 100644
>> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c
>> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c
>> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ int libxl__domain_build_info_setdefault(libxl__gc *gc,
>>      if (!b_info->device_model_version) {
>>          if (b_info->type == LIBXL_DOMAIN_TYPE_HVM)
>>              b_info->device_model_version =
>> -                LIBXL_DEVICE_MODEL_VERSION_QEMU_XEN_TRADITIONAL;
>> +                LIBXL_DEVICE_MODEL_VERSION_QEMU_XEN;

> Is there anyway we may keep qemu-traditional as default for NetBSD?
> Upstream Qemu is not working on NetBSD, and I'm afraid it needs some
> heavy patching.

> Could a helper function be added to libxl_{netbsd/linux}.c to decide
> which device model to use?

And shouldn't the example configuration files and documentation be patched as 
well ?

>>          else {
>>              const char *dm;
>>              int rc;
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>> 





_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel