[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] Proposed new "memory capacity claim" hypercall/feature
- To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 07:36:57 +0000
- Cc: TimDeegan <tim@xxxxxxx>, Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>, IanCampbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, George Shuklin <george.shuklin@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, DarioFaggioli <raistlin@xxxxxxxx>, Kurt Hackel <kurt.hackel@xxxxxxxxxx>, Zhigang Wang <zhigang.x.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 07:38:01 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
- Thread-index: Ac29g9SrP69REaOlQ0SR3bcqFiIGyA==
- Thread-topic: Proposed new "memory capacity claim" hypercall/feature
On 07/11/2012 22:17, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think this brings us back to the proposed "claim" hypercall/subop.
> Unless there are further objections or suggestions for different
> approaches, I'll commence prototyping it, OK?
Yes, in fact I thought you'd started already!
K.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
