Re: [Xen-devel] Xen4.2 S3 regression?

[Javier Marcet <jmarcet@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Adding the additional call in xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c causes an
>> instant reboot on resume.
>
> That addition can hardly be responsible for a reboot. Did you

Just like I could perform a full cycle without issues, the instant
reboot might as well be another way the race ends.

> have "noreboot" (or "reboot=no") in place on the Xen command
> line? "sync_console"?

Neither of them. I have used the sync_console parameter to check
whether it changed anything but I removed it afterwards.

> And then again, for the other failure case, iirc it was the kernel
> that died, not the hypervisor, so the problem there isn't directly
> related to the problems here I would guess.

All I know is that I'm using that same kernel without hypervisor, with
lots of suspend/resume and not a single issue.

With the two kernel patches from Konrad added I can also suspend and
resume fine under the hypervisor but there is always a cpu which
receives an irq while offline.


-- 
Javier Marcet <jmarcet@xxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel