Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/8]: PVH: Basic and preparatory changes

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> > For example in balloon.c we are probably only interested in memory
> > related behavior, so checking for XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap
> > should be enough.  In other parts of the code we might want to check
> > for xen_pv_domain(). If xen_pv_domain() and
> > XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap are not enough, we could introduce
> > another small XENFEAT that specifies that the domain is running in a
> > HVM container. This way they are all reusable.
> 
> yeah, I thought about that, but wasn't sure what the implications would
> be for a guest thats not PVH but has auto xlated physmap, if there's
> such a possibility. If you guys think thats not an issue, I can change
> it.

dom0_shadow=on on the hypervisor mode enables that in PV mode.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel