Re: [Xen-devel] PoD code killing domain before it really gets started

[Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

At 08:34 +0100 on 07 Aug (1344328495), Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 06.08.12 at 18:03, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I guess there are two problems with that:
> > * As you've seen, apparently dom0 may access these pages before any
> > faults happen.
> > * If it happens that reclaim_single is below the only zeroed page, the
> > guest will crash even when there is reclaim-able memory available.
> > 
> > Two ways we could fix this:
> > 1. Remove dom0 accesses (what on earth could be looking at a
> > not-yet-created VM?)
> 
> I'm told it's a monitoring daemon, and yes, they are intending to
> adjust it to first query the GFN's type (and don't do the access
> when it's not populated, yet). But wait, I didn't check the code
> when I recommended this - XEN_DOMCTL_getpageframeinfo{2,3)
> also call get_page_from_gfn() with P2M_ALLOC, so would also
> trigger the PoD code (in -unstable at least) - Tim, was that really
> a correct adjustment in 25355:974ad81bb68b? It looks to be a
> 1:1 translation, but is that really necessary?

AFAICT 25355:974ad81bb68b doesn't change anything.  Back in 4.1-testing
the lookup was done with gmfn_to_mfn(), which boils down to a lookup
with p2m_alloc.

> If one wanted to find out whether a page is PoD to avoid getting it
> populated, how would that be done from outside the hypervisor? Would
> we need XEN_DOMCTL_getpageframeinfo4 for this?

We'd certainly need _some_ change to the hypercall interface, as there's
no XEN_DOMCTL_PFINFO_ rune for 'PoD', and presumably you'd want to know
the difference between PoD and not-present.

> > 2. Allocate the PoD cache before populating the p2m table

Any reason not to do this?

Tim.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel