[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4 of 4 v7/leftover] Some automatic NUMA placement documentation

To: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@xxxxxxxx>
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:31:08 +0100
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 14:31:21 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 15:42 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> +It is also possible to deal with NUMA by partitioning the system using
> +cpupools (available in the upcoming release of Xen, 4.2).

Since you are respinning anyway...

For in tree docs we should talk about this in the present tense I think,
basically you can just drop the bit in parenthesis IMHO

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 4 v7/leftover] Automatic NUMA placement for xl
  - From: Dario Faggioli
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4 of 4 v7/leftover] Some automatic NUMA placement documentation
  - From: Dario Faggioli

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3] libxl: make libxl_cdrom_insert async
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] PoD code killing domain before it really gets started
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4 of 4 v7/leftover] Some automatic NUMA placement documentation
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1 of 4 v7/leftover] libxl: kill the need for checking and linking to libm
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.