[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Xen/MCE: adjust for future new vMCE model
On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 07:44 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 07:39 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > > >>> On 05.07.12 at 05:03, "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Jan Beulich wrote: > > >> Also I seem to recall that there was going to be a need to > > >> save/restore MCi_CTL2, but there's nothing being done in that > > >> direction. > > > > > > Yes, but that would be done at new vMCE. > > > Current vMCE didn't enable MCG_CMCI_P, and MCi_CTL2 are not used, so we > > > don't save/restore MCi_CTL2 at this version. > > > > But _that_ is the major save/restore related issue to be > > addressed, at least if backward migration (4.2 -> 4.1) is also > > to be working reasonably. If such compatibility is entirely > > unneeded, then I agree that it likely doesn't need any > > consideration at this point. > > We don't generally worry about N->N-1 migration, just N->N+1. If there's nothing to save in 4.2 (and therefore to restore in 4.3) what is it we are giving a freeze exception to again? If there's no save/restore can you even migrate a guest with vMCE enabled at all? (these aren't rhetorical questions, I have absolutely no idea how this stuff works ;-)) Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |