Re: [Xen-devel] Security vulnerability process, and CVE-2012-0217

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 29.06.12 at 12:26, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> As to downstreams, I think only direct ones should be involved in
>> any decision making processes. Indirect ones might be allowed on
>> the list, but exclusively as observers. Mis-use of the observer role
>> (e.g. as in influencing those participating in decision making in
>> undue ways), should it become known, should result in removal of
>> list membership.
> 
> Do we have an outline of who should decide that someone has mis-used
> their role, what kind of appeal process there is (if any), and when
> and under what conditions a person or organization can be reinstated
> to the list?

If common sense can't be applied here (and from how subsequent
discussion went I'm afraid it can't be), I don't think we can come
up with a definition that can't be put under attack by someone for
what would appear to be not completely illegitimate reasons.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel