Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 ]libxl: allow to allocate cpumap with specific size

[Dario Faggioli <raistlin@xxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 15:58 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 15:54 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Zhang, Yang Z writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 ]libxl: allow to allocate 
> > cpumap with specific size"):
> > > Change from v2:
> > > Rebase on top of latest head.
> > > 
> > > Currently, libxl_cpumap_alloc()allocate the cpumap with size of
> > > number of physical cpus. In some place, we may want to allocate
> > > specific size of cpumap.  This patch allow to pass a argument to
> > > specific the size that you want to allocate. If pass 0, it means the
> > > size is equal to number of physical cpus.
> > 
> > Isn't this same objective achieved in a more general way by Dario's
> >   [PATCH 05 of 10 v2] libxl: rename libxl_cpumap to libxl_bitmap
> 
Well, there's sure is a clash, as I'm changing the name of map data
structure. If you check this in, I'll rebase mine one on top of it.


> Didn't Dario's patch build on this one, or perhaps incorporate it?
> 
No, or at least not yet, as this patch is not in yet. Anyway, that's of
course possible, just decide what you prefer. :-)

Merging this patch and my 05/10 won't be that hard, and I can take care
of it, and the same should apply to this "[Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 ]libxl:
allow to set more than 31 vcpus".

Thanks and Regards,
Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel