[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/amd: fix crash as Xen Dom0 on AMD Trinity systems
- To: "Borislav Petkov" <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 16:40:37 +0100
- Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx>, jeremy@xxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jacob Shin <Jacob.Shin@xxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, mingo@xxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Wed, 30 May 2012 15:40:56 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
>>> On 30.05.12 at 17:12, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This current case should be a perfect example for why xen shouldn't be
> sprinkling code all over the place.
Which means you're denying the benefits of para-virtualization
(at the base system level; perhaps it's less of a problem for you
when it comes to pv device drivers, which are generally
standalone entities) as that's what distinguishes Xen from all
other virtualization solutions Linux supports.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
