[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: use xc_topologyinfo to figure out how many CPUs we actually have
Within libxl_get_cpu_topology(), considering all the CPUs the hypervisor supports to be valid topology entries might lead to misleading and incorrect behaviours, e.g., the output of `xl info -n' below on a 16 cores machine: ... cpu_topology : cpu: core socket node 0: 0 1 0 1: 0 1 0 2: 1 1 0 3: 1 1 0 4: 9 1 0 5: 9 1 0 6: 10 1 0 7: 10 1 0 8: 0 0 1 9: 0 0 1 10: 1 0 1 11: 1 0 1 12: 9 0 1 13: 9 0 1 14: 10 0 1 15: 10 0 1 16: 0 0 0 17: 0 0 0 18: 0 0 0 19: 0 0 0 20: 0 0 0 ... ... 62: 0 0 0 63: 0 0 0 However, xc_topologyinfo() tells us (in max_cpu_index) how many entries arrays it returns corresponds to actually valid CPUs, so let's use that information. Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl.c b/tools/libxl/libxl.c --- a/tools/libxl/libxl.c +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl.c @@ -2903,7 +2903,8 @@ libxl_cputopology *libxl_get_cpu_topolog } for (i = 0; i < max_cpus; i++) { -#define V(map, i) (map[i] == INVALID_TOPOLOGY_ID) ? \ +#define V(map, i) (i > tinfo.max_cpu_index || \ + map[i] == INVALID_TOPOLOGY_ID) ? \ LIBXL_CPUTOPOLOGY_INVALID_ENTRY : map[i] ret[i].core = V(coremap, i); ret[i].socket = V(socketmap, i); _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |