[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] auto balloon initial domain and fix dom0_mem=X inconsistencies (v5).
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 07:12:18PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote: > On 07/05/12 19:48, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 05:27:27PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote: > >> On 03/05/12 16:15, David Vrabel wrote: > >>> > >>> xen: update VA mapping when releasing memory during setup > >>> > >>> In xen_memory_setup(), if a page that is being released has a VA > >>> mapping this must also be updated. Otherwise, the page will be not > >>> released completely -- it will still be referenced in Xen and won't be > >>> freed util the mapping is removed and this prevents it from being > >>> reallocated at a different PFN. > >>> > >>> This was already being done for the ISA memory region in > >>> xen_ident_map_ISA() but on many systems this was omitting a few pages > >>> as many systems marked a few pages below the ISA memory region as > >>> reserved in the e820 map. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> --- > >> [...] > >>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c > >>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c > >>> @@ -1929,29 +1929,6 @@ static void xen_set_fixmap(unsigned idx, > >>> phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot) > >>> #endif > >>> } > >>> > >>> -void __init xen_ident_map_ISA(void) > >>> -{ > >>> - unsigned long pa; > >>> - > >>> - /* > >>> - * If we're dom0, then linear map the ISA machine addresses into > >>> - * the kernel's address space. > >>> - */ > >>> - if (!xen_initial_domain()) > >>> - return; > >> > >> It might look like this test has gone, however the new code which > >> updates the VA mapping uses the e820 map and for a domU its map will not > >> have a ISA region so there's no mapping to be updated. > > > > What if you use e820_hole=1 and the pci=xx in the guest? > > Are these xl configuration options? I'm not familiar with xl. Yeah. Just have this in your guest config: e820_hole=1 pci=["01:00.0"] (And do the PCI bind/unbind to the xen-pciback module) but looking at the source there is this comment: /* Weed out anything under 1MB */ so I think we are fine. > > The PCI memory hole should be above 3 GiB so this hole will be will > above the memory that will be initially mapped at boot. > > I've not managed to persuade my test box to passthrough a PCI device to > a guest (using xapi as the toolstack) to confirm, though. I'll have > another go tomorrow. > > David > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |