|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Workings/effectiveness of the xen-acpi-processor driver
On 05/02/2012 01:14 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 01:06:34PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:On 05/02/2012 12:08 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: Why not use CPU number instead of zero here? but I am wondering whether in the future we might hit another bug because this routine will return the same APICID for all VCPUs.Later on it does a check for 'smp_processor_id()' - and if that is anything but zero it will bail out. Can you point me to the check you are referring to? -boris So this shoudl solve the problem for the bootup processor.-boris+ }; + int ret = 0; + + /* Shouldn't need this as APIC is turned off for PV, and we only + * get called on the bootup processor. But just in case. */ + if (!xen_initial_domain() || smp_processor_id()) + return 0; + + if (reg == APIC_LVR) + return 0x10; + + if (reg != APIC_ID) + return 0; + + ret = HYPERVISOR_dom0_op(&op); + if (ret) + return 0; + + return op.u.pcpu_info.apic_id; } static void xen_apic_write(u32 reg, u32 val) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |