[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/07] HVM firmware passthrough
At 23:59 +0100 on 01 May (1335916778), Julian Pidancet wrote: > >> Would we still be able to do that with the simplifications you're > >> suggesting here ? > > > > Yes, you could definitely do it without all this module stuff. Passing > > an address and length in Xenstore would work. > > Isn't it kind of the same thing ? I mean, the BIOS or an Option ROM to > pre-load could be seen by hvmloader as "modules" because they would > have to be passed by the toolstack the same way as ACPI or SMBIOS > tables. Yes, it's similar. But the new module marshalling/unmarshalling code isn't necessary for any of them. Tim. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |