Re: [Xen-devel] [Xen-users] xl doesn't honour the parameter cpu_weight from my config file while xm does honour it

[Dieter Bloms <dieter@xxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

On Tue, Apr 24, Dieter Bloms wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Apr 24, Ian Jackson wrote:
> 
> > Perhaps it would be better to have a single sched_params struct which
> > contained all the parameters needed for any scheduler, and simply have
> > them ignored by libxl for schedulers we're not using.

...

> Anyway I think it is a good design to have one struct with all parameters
> and I'am willing to implement it.

I've made a new patch.
Maybe it fit all your needs.


-- 
best regards

  Dieter Bloms

--
I do not get viruses because I do not use MS software.
If you use Outlook then please do not put my email address in your
address-book so that WHEN you get a virus it won't use my address in the
>From field.

Attachment: add_support_for_cpu_weight_config_in_xl.diff
Description: Text Data

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel