Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 12353: tolerable FAIL

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 12353: tolerable 
FAIL"):
> On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 02:44 +0000, xen.org wrote:
> > flight 12353 xen-unstable real [real]
> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/12353/
> > 
> > Failures :-/ but no regressions.
> > 
> > Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
> >  build-i386-pvops              4 kernel-build           fail pass in 12352
> >  build-amd64-pvops             4 kernel-build           fail pass in 12352
> 
> I thought we had changed things such that *-build were always blocking
> failures? We don't seem to have pushed anything on this occasion but in
> general we wouldn't want to have done so.

This isn't "blocking" because it's not a "regression" because it
failed in the baseline too because the baseline was identical to the
candidate.  But nevertheless the report is wrong and I have pushed a
fix which ought to fix that.

(The test system is down ATM because we have had a database problem
which is being sorted out...)

Thanks,
Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel