Re: [Xen-devel] vMCE vs migration

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 13.02.12 at 09:30, Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, Jan Beulich wrote:
> 
>> > Regarding these messages, are they guest addresses?
>> > 
>> > (XEN) traps.c:3131: GPF (0000): ffff82c4801d4c6c -> ffff82c480226eb4
>> 
>> No, these are hypervisor ones.
> 
> These are the functions they belong to:
> 
> (XEN) traps.c:3131: GPF (0000): ffff82c4801d61ec -> ffff82c48022aa2e
> (XEN) do_general_protection: ffff82c4801d61ec 
> vmx_msr_read_intercept+0x2d8/0x358
> (XEN) do_general_protection: ffff82c48022aa2e vmac+0x6c8/0x99a

This appears to be the rdmsr_safe() at the bottom of the default case
in vmx_msr_read_intercept(), and I would expect those to go away
once the vMCE save/restore patch is working properly.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel