Re: [Xen-devel] xen-4.1.3-rc1-pre changeset 23224:cccd6c68e1b9 hvm xl not execute vif-bridge when xl destroy hvmdomain or xl trigger hvmdomain power

[Teck Choon Giam <giamteckchoon@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Stefano Stabellini
<stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Feb 2012, Teck Choon Giam wrote:
>> Hi Stefano,
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Stefano Stabellini
>> <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 9 Feb 2012, Teck Choon Giam wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I need to check whether is this intended?  When using xl create hvm
>> >> domains, it does execute vif-bridge script.  However, when doing xl
>> >> destroy or xl trigger hvmdomain power it doesn't execute vif-bridge
>> >> script.  I just did the following to test:
>> >>
>> >> # cp -pvf /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge.orig
>> >> # cat > /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge <<'EOF'
>> >> #!/bin/bash
>> >> echo "$@" >> vif-bridge.log
>> >> /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge.orig "$@"
>> >> EOF
>> >>
>> >> When using xm and xl to create hvmdomain, I can see vif-bridge.log
>> >> appended with:
>> >>
>> >> online type_if=vif
>> >> online type_if=vif
>> >> add type_if=tap
>> >> add type_if=tap
>> >>
>> >> Since I have allocated 2 vifs (one for WAN and one for LAN)... so it
>> >> gets to execute vif-bridge once for each vif which looks right.
>> >>
>> >> Now the problem is xl trigger hvmdomain power and xl destroy power.
>> >> Both never call vif-bridge script as there isn't any such line like:
>> >>
>> >> offline type_if=vif
>> >> offline type_if=vif
>> >>
>> >> Whereby when I tried with xm trigger hvmdomain power, it does call
>> >> vif-bridge script as the above two lines get logged.
>> >>
>> >> This will leave the iptables FORWARD rule intact when using xl which I
>> >> reported before :(
>> >>
>> >> See http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/xen/devel/204990
>> >
>> > Actually I have just run the same test but I didn't see any issues:
>> > vif-bridge gets called correctly when the domain dies.
>> >
>> > It is difficult to tell what is going wrong in your case because
>> > vif-bridge is not called directly by XL (or Xend), it is called by
>> > vif-setup, that is called by udev when the vif network interface is
>> > destroyed.
>> > I suggest you check that your udev scripts are correct
>> > (/etc/udev/rules.d/xen-backend.rules).
>>
>> Here is the content of the rules:
>>
>> # cat /etc/udev/rules.d/xen-backend.rules
>> SUBSYSTEM=="xen-backend", KERNEL=="tap*",
>> RUN+="/etc/xen/scripts/blktap $env{ACTION}"
>> SUBSYSTEM=="xen-backend", KERNEL=="vbd*", RUN+="/etc/xen/scripts/block
>> $env{ACTION}"
>> SUBSYSTEM=="xen-backend", KERNEL=="vtpm*", RUN+="/etc/xen/scripts/vtpm
>> $env{ACTION}"
>> SUBSYSTEM=="xen-backend", KERNEL=="vif2-*",
>> RUN+="/etc/xen/scripts/vif2 $env{ACTION}"
>> SUBSYSTEM=="xen-backend", KERNEL=="vif-*", ACTION=="online",
>> RUN+="/etc/xen/scripts/vif-setup online type_if=vif"
>> SUBSYSTEM=="xen-backend", KERNEL=="vif-*", ACTION=="offline",
>> RUN+="/etc/xen/scripts/vif-setup offline type_if=vif"
>> SUBSYSTEM=="xen-backend", KERNEL=="vscsi*",
>> RUN+="/etc/xen/scripts/vscsi $env{ACTION}"
>> SUBSYSTEM=="xen-backend", ACTION=="remove",
>> RUN+="/etc/xen/scripts/xen-hotplug-cleanup"
>> KERNEL=="evtchn", NAME="xen/%k"
>> SUBSYSTEM=="xen", KERNEL=="blktap[0-9]*", NAME="xen/%k", MODE="0600"
>> SUBSYSTEM=="blktap2", KERNEL=="blktap[0-9]*", NAME="xen/blktap-2/%k",
>> MODE="0600"
>> KERNEL=="blktap-control", NAME="xen/blktap-2/control", MODE="0600"
>> KERNEL=="gntdev", NAME="xen/%k", MODE="0600"
>> KERNEL=="pci_iomul", NAME="xen/%k", MODE="0600"
>> KERNEL=="tapdev[a-z]*", NAME="xen/blktap-2/tapdev%m", MODE="0600"
>> SUBSYSTEM=="net", KERNEL=="tap*", ACTION=="add",
>> RUN+="/etc/xen/scripts/vif-setup $env{ACTION} type_if=tap"
>>
>> I guess the responsible lines are:
>>
>> SUBSYSTEM=="xen-backend", KERNEL=="vif-*", ACTION=="online",
>> RUN+="/etc/xen/scripts/vif-setup online type_if=vif"
>> SUBSYSTEM=="xen-backend", KERNEL=="vif-*", ACTION=="offline",
>> RUN+="/etc/xen/scripts/vif-setup offline type_if=vif"
>>
>> So this is my testing:
>>
>> # cp -pvf /etc/xen/scripts/vif-setup /etc/xen/scripts/vif-setup.orig
>> # cat > /etc/xen/scripts/vif-setup <<'EOF'
>> #!/bin/bash
>> echo "$@" >> $0.log
>> /etc/xen/scripts/vif-setup.orig "$@"
>> EOF
>>
>> Now my testing purely on xm/xl trigger hvmdomain power.
>>
>> Online/Offline get called using xm but xl wise is Online get called
>> but not Offline with hvm domains like windows XP/server 2008r2... any
>> idea what else can make this behaviour difference between xl/xm?
>>
>> The /etc/xen/scripts/vif-setup.log as below.
>>
>> The below is using xl create hvmdomain and get logged:
>> online type_if=vif
>> online type_if=vif
>> add type_if=tap
>> add type_if=tap
>> When using xl trigger hvmdomain power... no log entry at all.
>
> Does xl trigger hvmdomain power do anything at all?
> Is the guest shutting down?

Yes, it does for both xm/xl.

Thanks.

Kindest regards,
Giam Teck Choon

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel