[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 09/12] xen: only map PV guest grants via iommu if HAS_PASSTHROUGH



>>> On 20.01.12 at 13:06, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  xen/Rules.mk             |    1 +
>  xen/arch/arm/dummy.S     |    2 --
>  xen/common/grant_table.c |    6 ++++++
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/Rules.mk b/xen/Rules.mk
> index e25e8d4..ce88316 100644
> --- a/xen/Rules.mk
> +++ b/xen/Rules.mk
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ CFLAGS-$(perfc_arrays)  += -DPERF_ARRAYS
>  CFLAGS-$(lock_profile)  += -DLOCK_PROFILE
>  CFLAGS-$(HAS_ACPI)      += -DHAS_ACPI
>  CFLAGS-$(HAS_TMEM)      += -DHAS_TMEM
> +CFLAGS-$(HAS_PASSTHROUGH) += -DHAS_PASSTHROUGH
>  CFLAGS-$(frame_pointer) += -fno-omit-frame-pointer -DCONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
>  
>  ifneq ($(max_phys_cpus),)
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/dummy.S b/xen/arch/arm/dummy.S
> index 5010619..e858613 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/dummy.S
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/dummy.S
> @@ -27,8 +27,6 @@ DUMMY(gmfn_to_mfn);
>  DUMMY(gnttab_clear_flag);
>  DUMMY(gnttab_mark_dirty);
>  DUMMY(hypercall_create_continuation);
> -DUMMY(iommu_map_page);
> -DUMMY(iommu_unmap_page);
>  DUMMY(is_iomem_page);
>  DUMMY(max_page);
>  DUMMY(node_online_map);
> diff --git a/xen/common/grant_table.c b/xen/common/grant_table.c
> index b024016..1798fcd 100644
> --- a/xen/common/grant_table.c
> +++ b/xen/common/grant_table.c
> @@ -434,6 +434,7 @@ static int _set_status(unsigned gt_version,
>          return _set_status_v2(domid, readonly, mapflag, shah, act, status);
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef HAS_PASSTHROUGH
>  static void mapcount(
>      struct domain *ld, unsigned long mfn,
>      unsigned int *wrc, unsigned int *rdc)
> @@ -456,6 +457,7 @@ static void mapcount(
>          rcu_unlock_domain(rd);
>      }
>  }
> +#endif
>  
>  /*
>   * Returns 0 if TLB flush / invalidate required by caller.
> @@ -662,6 +664,7 @@ __gnttab_map_grant_ref(
>          goto undo_out;
>      }
>  
> +#ifdef HAS_PASSTHROUGH
>      if ( !is_hvm_domain(ld) && need_iommu(ld) )

Wouldn't #define-ing need_iommu() to 0 in the ARM headers achieve
the same effect, without cluttering common code?

Jan

>      {
>          unsigned int wrc, rdc;
> @@ -689,6 +692,7 @@ __gnttab_map_grant_ref(
>              goto undo_out;
>          }
>      }
> +#endif
>  
>      TRACE_1D(TRC_MEM_PAGE_GRANT_MAP, op->dom);
>  
> @@ -858,6 +862,7 @@ __gnttab_unmap_common(
>              act->pin -= GNTPIN_hstw_inc;
>      }
>  
> +#ifdef HAS_PASSTHROUGH
>      if ( !is_hvm_domain(ld) && need_iommu(ld) )
>      {
>          unsigned int wrc, rdc;
> @@ -874,6 +879,7 @@ __gnttab_unmap_common(
>              goto unmap_out;
>          }
>      }
> +#endif
>  
>      /* If just unmapped a writable mapping, mark as dirtied */
>      if ( !(op->flags & GNTMAP_readonly) )
> -- 
> 1.7.2.5
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel 




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.