Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 15/15] libxl: New event generation API

[Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 17:42 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > So I am up for anything that would remove this duality.
> 
> That's a very strong statement to make about a patch which Ian hasn't
> posted yet (nor, I suspect, has he even finished writing it).
> 
> Rather than entrenching positions now lets wait and evaluate that patch
> on its merits.
 
I am not against this "future" patch or even the concept behind it.
And I am certainly not going to argue against a patch I haven't even
seen yet.

What I am saying is that if we need a malloc allocated gc is the near
future then I am very strongly in favor of changing the allocation of
all of them rather than only some.

Also, there is the matter of the recursive lock, that started this
discussion and brought us here.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel