[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Phoronix Xen vs KVM vs Virtualbox benchmark with Ubuntu 11.10


  • To: Alex Bligh <alex@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 10:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dokter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Alex Bligh <alex@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 10:31:42 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dppTO3rUjA9DIi1m8YF6kwtUPT+mF7nMAule6Z7EM7bGutgKC0AK7TqrFSkDHifdAaPMclrW8lvsKj+9hIjh7l9+Ykgann11lxN13QsRs4FuPCGq/BxovBY+FyMw/ROPCdLxa8DNG/K/2DisqMZhxZIElVZdHXV2mezm7iB7p9I=;
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

I didn't benchmarking too much but same Ubuntu Oneiric Instance ( on my box) may be loaded for virsh "Qemu" connection  and may be loaded for "Xen 4.1.2" connection.
I see significant performance improvement for Oneiric PVHVM.  It has performance pretty
close to KVM guests (virtio disks and NICs, Qemu-kvm 0.15.1).  I suspect Phoronix
tested just HVM, regardless kernel rebuild in Ubuntu's style is very well documented.
It's a question of basic debian background nothing else.

Boris.

--- On Wed, 11/2/11, Alex Bligh <alex@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Alex Bligh <alex@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Phoronix Xen vs KVM vs Virtualbox benchmark with Ubuntu 11.10
To: "Alex Bligh" <alex@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>, "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@xxxxxx>, "Ian Campbell" <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Alex Bligh" <alex@xxxxxxxxxxx>, dokter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wednesday, November 2, 2011, 1:07 PM



--On 2 November 2011 13:34:21 +0000 Alex Bligh <alex@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> I was able to load Oneiric as PV on HVM at Xen 4.1.2 Oneiric Dom0
>> (3.1.0-030100-generic)  after rebuilding the recent 3.1.0-3 Ubuntu's
>> kernel with
>> CONFIG_XEN_PLATFORM_PCI=y , uploading debian packages  :-
>
> I very much doubt the reviewer did this. The -server variant (certainly
> on one of the Oneiric pre-releases) had CONFIG_XEN_PLATFORM_PCI=m so
> it should have been brought in by modprobe. I would guess -virtual
> is the same. The installer OTOH does /not/ have the module in the udeb
> which is an omission.

Actually, my mistake. -server does include CONFIG_XEN_PLATFORM_PCI
but
/lib/modules/3.0.0-12-server/kernel/drivers/xen/xen-platform-pci.ko
(at the very least) is not being built into the initrd for some
reason, even on the distributed version.

I somehow doubt the Phoronix guys built their own kernel.  That
would imply they were using emulated disks.

-- Alex Bligh

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.