[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Is: [PATCH] x86/paravirt: PTE updates in k(un)map_atomic need to be synchronous, regardless of lazy_mmu mode. Was: Re: [PATCH] x86/paravirt: Partially revert "remove lazy mode in interrupts"



On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 01:55:14PM -0400, Christopher S. Aker wrote:
> >This patch fixes an outstanding issue that has been reported since
> >2.6.37. Under a heavy loaded machine processing "fork()" calls could
> >keepover with:
> 
> I noticed this patch is not in Linux 3.1 -- was this fixed some
> other way, or is it still in mainline's pipeline somewhere?

Well, looks like it got dropped out of Andrew's tree. Not sure why, but
let me make sure it gets the proper attention. Thanks for spotting it!

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.