[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Testing nested virtualization on Intel CPUs


  • To: Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:50:39 +0100
  • Cc: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:53:30 -0700
  • Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAFVBMVEWysKsSBQMIAwIZCwj///8wIhxoRDXH9QHCAAABeUlEQVQ4jaXTvW7DIBAAYCQTzz2hdq+rdg494ZmBeE5KYHZjm/d/hJ6NfzBJpp5kRb5PHJwvMPMk2L9As5Y9AmYRBL+HAyJKeOU5aHRhsAAvORQ+UEgAvgddj/lwAXndw2laEDqA4x6KEBhjYRCg9tBFCOuJFxg2OKegbWjbsRTk8PPhKPD7HcRxB7cqhgBRp9Dcqs+B8v4CQvFdqeot3Kov6hBUn0AJitrzY+sgUuiA8i0r7+B3AfqKcN6t8M6HtqQ+AOoELCikgQSbgabKaJW3kn5lBs47JSGDhhLKDUh1UMipwwinMYPTBuIBjEclSaGZUk9hDlTb5sUTYN2SFFQuPe4Gox1X0FZOufjgBiV1Vls7b+GvK3SU4wfmcGo9rPPQzgIabfj4TYQo15k3bTHX9RIw/kniir5YbtJF4jkFG+dsDK1IgE413zAthU/vR2HVMmFUPIHTvF6jWCpFaGw/A3qWgnbxpSm9MSmY5b3pM1gvNc/gQfwBsGwF0VCtxZgAAAAASUVORK5CYII=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:38:10 +0100
Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> At 22:18 -0700 on 20 Sep (1316557136), AP wrote:
> > > Yes, booting Xen as a nested guest is very slow at startup, because of
> > > how Xen relocates the bottom 1MB at boot time.  You might find that
> > > 32-bit Xen boots faster.
> > 
> > Could please expand a little on why the relocation causes it to slow down?
> 
> IIRC, the relocation itself is very slow because Xen just copies the low
> 1MB, which includes the VGA hole, so there are a lot of emulated reads.

That seems a bit odd - ISA space reads can have side effects.

Alan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.