[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] [RFC] VT-d: always clean up dpci timers.

To: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Kay, Allen M" <allen.m.kay@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:33:28 -0700
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "keir@xxxxxxx" <keir@xxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:34:21 -0700
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
Thread-index: AcxHg0zV5A6x5Wu5QziHynkoui+yCgAvVwwA
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] [RFC] VT-d: always clean up dpci timers.

> Is there a mapping from bdf to irq in the iommu code or are they handled
> entirely separately?

I think they are handled separately inside of xen.  Irq stuff is mostly about 
mirq to girq mapping.  There should be BDF to irq correlation in user mode code.

Allen

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] VT-d: always clean up dpci timers.
  - From: Tim Deegan
- [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] [RFC] VT-d: always clean up dpci timers.
  - From: Kay, Allen M
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] [RFC] VT-d: always clean up dpci timers.
  - From: Tim Deegan

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/5] Enable QEMU to handle more than 2GB with Xen.
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] anomaly in irq check in fixup_page_fault()
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] [RFC] VT-d: always clean up dpci timers.
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] Re: trip to shanghai
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.