[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] xen: implement unplug protocol in xen_platform
Am 30.06.2011 16:16, schrieb Stefano Stabellini: > On Thu, 30 Jun 2011, Kevin Wolf wrote: >>> +static int pci_piix3_xen_ide_unplug(DeviceState *dev) >>> +{ >>> + PCIDevice *pci_dev; >>> + PCIIDEState *pci_ide; >>> + DriveInfo *di; >>> + int i = 0; >>> + >>> + pci_dev = DO_UPCAST(PCIDevice, qdev, dev); >>> + pci_ide = DO_UPCAST(PCIIDEState, dev, pci_dev); >>> + >>> + for (; i < 3; i++) { >>> + di = drive_get_by_index(IF_IDE, i); >>> + if (di != NULL && di->bdrv != NULL && !di->bdrv->removable) { >>> + DeviceState *ds = bdrv_get_attached(di->bdrv); >>> + if (ds) { >>> + bdrv_detach(di->bdrv, ds); >>> + } >>> + bdrv_close(di->bdrv); >>> + pci_ide->bus[di->bus].ifs[di->unit].bs = NULL; >> >> Have you tested if this is enough if the guest tries to continue using >> the device? I don't know of any case where it's not sufficient, just >> trying to make sure that it's really true in practice. > > The purpose of this is to "hide" the disk from the guest. The unplug is > supposed to happen *before* the guest enumerates the IDE disks; it is > responsibility of the guest to make sure of it. > I tested it with Linux PV on HVM drivers, and Linux doesn't see the > emulated disk after the unplug, as it should be. Yeah. What I meant is that we should make sure that a misbehaving guest, which just keeps on playing with the IDE ports anyway, can't crash qemu. A quick review suggests that it is the case, but testing it anyway would be better. >>> + drive_put_ref(di); >>> + } >>> + } >>> + qdev_reset_all(&(pci_ide->dev.qdev)); >>> + return 0; >>> +} >>> + >>> +PCIDevice *pci_piix3_xen_ide_init(PCIBus *bus, DriveInfo **hd_table, int >>> devfn) >>> +{ >>> + PCIDevice *dev; >>> + >>> + dev = pci_create_simple(bus, devfn, "piix3-ide-xen"); >>> + dev->qdev.info->unplug = pci_piix3_xen_ide_unplug; >> >> Can't this be moved into the PCIDeviceInfo now that we have a separate >> one for Xen? > > No because it would be overridden by the default pci unplug function, > that is not what we want in this case. Okay. I'm not familiar with that code, so I'll just trust you there. Kevin _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |