Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 2.6.39 - what Xen components went in.

[Thomas Goirand <thomas@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 05/14/2011 11:02 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 05:32:53PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> On 05/14/2011 12:49 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>>
>>>> I assume this means that drivers/block/xen-blkback.c is the last major
>>>> milestone to be pushed upstream?
>>>>     
>>> There are also some semi-major ones, but right now the xen-blkback is 
>>> important
>>> since it provides so much more performance benefit than the QEMU one.
>>>   
>>
>> Thanks a lot Konrad, for the report.
>>
>> Can you tell what the problem was with of xen-blkback.c?
> 
> Not sure I understand you. Then xen block backend (so 
> drivers/block/xen-blkback/*)
> is going through review on LKML?

Sorry, let me rephrase: why has drivers/block/xen-blkback.c not been
upstreamed to kernel.org yet? What was the blocker(s)? LKLM is a very
busy list, hard to follow...

Thomas

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel