[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] net: xen-netback: convert to hw_features

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 14:43 +0100, MichaÅ MirosÅaw wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 02:39:00PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 14:30 +0100, MichaÅ MirosÅaw wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 02:17:53PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > I fixed it with the following, I also moved the !can_sg MTU clamping
> > > > into a set_features hook (like we do with netfront). Am I right that
> > > > this pattern copes with changes to SG via ethtool etc better? I think
> > > > it's more future proof in any case.
> > > This looks wrong. Even if SG is turned on, you might get big skbs which
> > > are linearized. There is a difference in SG capability and SG offload
> > > status and as I see it the capability is what you need to test for MTU.
> > So the existing stuff in drivers/net/xen-netfront.c is wrong too?
> 
> Looks like it. But I don't really know what are the real constraints for MTU.
> What I know is that SG even if turned on needs not be used (and currently
> it's not e.g. if checksum offload is disabled).

The interesting case is the opposite one, isn't it? IOW if NETIF_F_SG is
disabled but the frontend/backend agree that they have the capability to
handle >PAGE_SIZE skbs

In my experience, the normal reason for disabling the NETIF_F_SG offload
status is that the underlying capability is somehow buggy, otherwise is
there any reason to turn it off?

> So MTU setting should not depend on SG offload state but on some capability.

Ian.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel