Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Backport request][pv-ops] kgdb on recent version of gdb

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

(please don't top post)
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 05:01 +0000, Frank Pan wrote:
> I've found that inside the 2.6.38.y stable tree, how about that?

It needs to be in the 2.6.32.y "longterm" tree.

You can request that by mailing stable@xxxxxxxxxx and the original patch
author(s) and suggesting that that changeset is backported to 2.6.32.x.

The fact that it has gone into 2.6.38.y suggests it should be a
reasonably easy ack to obtain.

Ian.

> 
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.38.y.git;a=commit;h=fb82c0ff27b2c40c6f7a3d1a94cafb154591fa80
> 
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 03/21/2011 05:08 PM, Frank Pan wrote:
> >>> I'd prefer to pick this up out of stable/longterm rather than just graft
> >>> it in as-is.  Do you know if it has been submitted as a stable kernel 
> >>> patch?
> >> Yes, it's also in the v2.6.38 tag of upstream.
> >> That means stable, right?
> >
> > No, "stable" in the sense of being sent to stable@xxxxxxxxxx for
> > application to older maintained kernels (including 2.6.32).
> >
> >    J
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel