|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] RE: dom0/xen boot problem
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:54:38AM -0800, Kay, Allen M wrote: > > I believe it is already in the Greg KH 2.6.37.x bug-fix branch. But ... we > > don't actually > > have a 2.6.37.x development branch. We do have a 2.6.38 one - wherein the > > patch is present. > > I thought xen/next-2.6.37 branch under > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy.xen.git is the 2.6.37 > development branch. We thought about it, but then 2.6.38 has so many neat stuff in it that it just seems easier to do it on top of 2.6.38. > > Is xen/next-2.6.38 under > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy.xen.git the development > branch for 2.6.38? > > Base on the attached email from you, that too also has missing bug fixes. It > sounds the best pvops tree to use is: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git > devel/next-2.6.38 Or better, use git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git #master (as it is the "stable" version). The devel/next-2.6.38 is a kitchensink right now. > > I will give this a try. Thank you! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [mailto:konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 11:36 AM > To: Kay, Allen M; Jeremy Fitzhardinge > Cc: Stefano Stabellini; Keir Fraser; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: dom0/xen boot problem > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:22:24AM -0800, Kay, Allen M wrote: > > Jeremy/Konrad, > > > > Thanks for Stefano's help, dom0/xen boot failure on my Sandybridge desktop > > SDP has been isolated to the following patch that is missing in both 2.6.32 > > and 2.6.37 PVOPS branches. According to PVOPS wiki 2.6.32 and 2.6.37 are > > suppose to be active branches. Can you back port this patch to both 2.6.32 > > and 2.6.37 branches? > > I believe it is already in the Greg KH 2.6.37.x bug-fix branch. But ... we > don't actually > have a 2.6.37.x development branch. We do have a 2.6.38 one - wherein the > patch is present. > > > Under 2.6.32.x.. Jeremy, I've stuck this patch and another in > for-2.6.32/bug-fixes. Could you pull it please? > > > > > I'm surprised that I'm the only person encountering this problem. Not > > being able use either printk or xen_raw_printk in > > xen_build_dynamic_phys_to_machine() does not help debugging either. I was > > going to save max_pfn in a global variable and then print it out later in > > xen_build_mfn_list_list() before Stefano pointed out this patch. :-) > > Oh man, what a headache. > > > > Allen > > > > ----- missing patch ------- > > > > commit cf04d120d9413de581437cf9a29f138ec1178f65 > > Author: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Thu Jan 27 10:03:14 2011 -0500 > > > > xen/p2m: Mark INVALID_P2M_ENTRY the mfn_list past max_pfn. > > > > In case the mfn_list does not have enough entries to fill > > a p2m page we do not want the entries from max_pfn up to > > the boundary to be filled with unknown values. Hence > > set them to INVALID_P2M_ENTRY. > > > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > ----- active pvops branches from pvops wiki page ----- > > > > Current active branches are: > > > > xen/stable-2.6.32.x - this is the long term maintained branch, tracking > > upstream kernel.org 2.6.32.x stable updates. This branch has Xen dom0 > > patches added. This is the recommended branch for most users. Changelog: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git;a=shortlog;h=xen/stable-2.6.32.x > > . > > xen/next-2.6.32 - This is a branch for next 2.6.32 version and gets > > migrated to the stable branch once automatic tests have succeeded. > > Changelog: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git;a=shortlog;h=xen/next-2.6.32 > > . > > xen/next-2.6.37 - this is the current development branch based on Linux > > 2.6.37. Changelog: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git;a=shortlog;h=xen/next-2.6.37 > > . Received: from rrsmsx606.amr.corp.intel.com (10.31.1.130) by orsmsx605.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.226.10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:48:44 -0800 Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com (10.253.24.26) by RRSMSX606-1.rr.intel.com (10.31.1.130) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.2.254.0; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 08:48:43 -0700 Received: from fmsmga101.fm.intel.com ([10.1.193.65]) by fmsmga002-1.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Feb 2011 07:48:43 -0800 Received: from lists.colo.xensource.com (HELO lists.xensource.com) ([70.42.241.110]) by mga01.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Feb 2011 07:48:43 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PsdQo-0007ZF-My; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:48:42 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PsdQN-0007SR-9k for xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:48:15 -0800 Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com (rcsinet10.oracle.com [148.87.113.121]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id n0VgWBd8ink2WV4I (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:48:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from rcsinet13.oracle.com (rcsinet13.oracle.com [148.87.113.125]) by rcsinet10.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.2) with ESMTP id p1OFm9d4027739 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:48:11 GMT Received: from acsmt355.oracle.com (acsmt355.oracle.com [141.146.40.155]) by rcsinet13.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.1) with ESMTP id p1OFm8ip020467; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:48:08 GMT Received: from abhmt015.oracle.com by acsmt353.oracle.com with ESMTP id 1083839291298562413; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:46:53 -0800 Received: from phenom (/209.6.55.207) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:46:53 -0800 Received: by phenom (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 94C46445B; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:46:52 -0500 (EST) From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> To: Rafal Wojtczuk <rafal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> CC: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sender: "xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:46:52 -0800 Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] tip of jeremy/xen.git xen/next-2.6.38 fails to compile Thread-Topic: [Xen-devel] tip of jeremy/xen.git xen/next-2.6.38 fails to compile Thread-Index: AcvUOlEJ5+J/nqwTSACVDrVlT4pwRA== Message-ID: <20110224154652.GB6893@xxxxxxxxxxxx> References: <20110224120056.GC2221@email> List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe> In-Reply-To: <20110224120056.GC2221@email> X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: RRSMSX606.amr.corp.intel.com X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ironport-av: E=Sophos;i="4.62,219,1297065600"; d="scan'208";a="833931283" x-ironport-anti-spam-filtered: true x-ironport-anti-spam-result: Al8BAE0MZk1GKvFukWdsb2JhbACmPwEBAgkLCgcRBCC9dYVgBIUQhXc x-virus-scanned: by bsmtpd at xensource.com x-beenthere: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx x-mailman-version: 2.1.5 list-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> list-post: <mailto:xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> errors-to: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx x-asg-debug-id: 1298562494-6d03170e0001-8pertM x-barracuda-envelope-from: konrad@xxxxxxxxxxxx x-asg-orig-subj: Re: [Xen-devel] tip of jeremy/xen.git xen/next-2.6.38 fails to compile x-barracuda-connect: rcsinet10.oracle.com[148.87.113.121] x-barracuda-start-time: 1298562494 x-barracuda-url: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi user-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) x-barracuda-spam-score: 0.00 x-barracuda-spam-status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=UNPARSEABLE_RELAY x-source-ip: acsmt355.oracle.com [141.146.40.155] x-ct-refid: str=0001.0A090206.4D667DB9.0070:SCFMA4539814,ss=1,fgs=0 x-auth-type: Internal IP x-barracuda-spam-report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.56272 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines x-barracuda-encrypted: AES256-SHA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 01:00:56PM +0100, Rafal Wojtczuk wrote: > > Hello, > > it looks like some patches are missing in the current xen/next-2.6.38. E.g. > > IRQF_FORCE_RESUME is used but not defined. > > Brave soul :-) > > For right now take my tree: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git devel/next-2.6.38 > > It has the dom0 + lots of patches (including the pciback and netback). > > No blkback yet. > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |