Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/3] xen: Use PM/Hibernate events for save/restore/chkpt

[Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > I believe it only "[PATCH 3/3] PM: pm.h - Add comments about Xen 
> > save/restore/chkpt use case"
> > 
> > (http://marc.info/?i=1298157158-5421-4-git-send-email-rshriram@xxxxxxxxx)
> 
> This particular one should go in _after_ the functional patches.
> 
> > I or Stefano (these patches are against Ian's tree which is againsts 
> > Stefano's
> > tree) can take the other patches and stick Pavel's Ack, Rafeal's Ack, Ian's 
> > Ack
> > on them and also my Signed-off for the Xen bits.
> > 
> > I think that would work?
> 
> In fact, I think it's better if all patches go through the Xen tree.
> 
 
I don't mind taking them but if they have to go after your
suspend-2.6/linux-next tree this would introduce a new dependency in the
branch I am preparing for linux-next myself.

Should I pull your suspend-2.6/linux-next tree into my linux-next branch?
Considering that this could create conflicts in linux-next if you
force-push your tree with some new changes and I don't update my version
of it, maybe it is better if I pull only a reduced version of it with
just the strict dependencies?

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel