Re: [xen-devel][PATCH 2/5] Xl interface change plus changes to code it impacts

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 14:38 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 21:22 +0000, Kamala Narasimhan wrote:
> > Attached are the changes made to xl disk related interface per earlier 
> > discussion.  Please let me know if there are further comments/issues to fix.
> 
> Please can you include a full/standalone commit message describing the
> change and the reasons for it etc, The reference to "earlier discussion"
> is likely to be lost with time.
> 
> Did we decide to leave DISK_BACKEND_DEFAULT (i.e. libxl chooses based on
> the image type, host's backend support etc) for 4.2? I don't mind if we
> did but does that make "block-dev-type" as described in patch 1/5
> non-optional? (and therefore not really deprecated)

Maybe this is handled in xl by patch 3/5?

(I should really apply the patch and read the result instead of trying
to decode the meaning from the patch form)

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel