Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.37 dom0 under Xen 4.1 clocksource not working

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>]

On 01/26/2011 12:12 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> Is this how 2.6.32 did it? Or was there no cpuidle driver in 2.6.32 so
> we never had tried this?

CPUIDLE is new.

>  With this being overwridden to HALT does that
> mean the hypervisor cycles through the Cx states? What about using
> MWAIT instead? How does this impact AMD platforms?

"halt" in this case is the safe_halt pvop, so it ends up going into the
appropriate hypercall.

    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel