Xen project Mailing List

Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report

To: "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx>, "Zheng, Shaohui" <shaohui.zheng@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>

Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:13:03 +0000

Cc:

Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 06:13:53 -0800

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=QPI/nSMbaWwDtssH1hLiHoQCOeNehVK4fxw7HJH+Zpglt9NCkkx1y6XIK2AGQq59V4 BJIvBsKI9939FTIOFiejqUq1NUe9jcgZ8DzJVfAUR4Xv5S2G/OewnHgT4hAtMU0PS35j rzBRUSeX/FcnETD4r+5jg4XlhJHpVpPPkjz+w=

List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Thread-index: Acu6GEBstpnTfIH/TdeQZvf0FjUZ0QAOlF+wAI5FPEAAA5TuuA==

Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] RE: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report

On 25/01/2011 14:05, "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 3. Think about how we could prevent such cases from panic Xen. > > Any ideas, hints, comments, suggestions or even fixes on it? Either the domain destroy path should forcibly unbind pirqs, or a non-empty set of pirq bindings should hold at least one reference to a domain, to prevent it being destroyed+freed. Is forcible unbinding ever dangerous to system stability? If not perhaps that is best. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

©2013 Xen Project, A Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. All Rights Reserved.
Linux Foundation is a registered trademark of The Linux Foundation.
Xen Project is a trademark of The Linux Foundation.