[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 05/10] xen/setup: Set identity mapping for non-RAM E820 and E820 gaps.

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> Couldn't you just do something like:
> 
>       if (e820->map[i].type != E820_RAM)

I am going to assume you meant '==' here.

>               continue;
> 
>       for (pfn = PFN_UP(last); pfn < PFN_DOWN(start); pfn++)
>               set_phys_to_machine(pfn, pfn);
>       identity += pfn - PFN_UP(last);
> 
>       last = end;
> 
> ie, handle the hole and non-RAM cases together?

A derivation of this does work:

   last = ISA_END_ADDRESS;
   for (i = 0; i < e820->nr_map; i++) {
                phys_addr_t start = e820->map[i].addr;
                phys_addr_t end = start + e820->map[i].size;

                if (end < start)
                        continue;

                /* Skip over the 1MB region. */
                if (last > end)
                        continue;

                if (e820->map[i].type == E820_RAM) {
                        /* Without saving 'last' we would end up gobbling RAM 
regions. */
                        last = end;
                        continue;
                }   

                for (pfn = PFN_UP(last); pfn < PFN_DOWN(end); pfn++)
                        set_phys_to_machine(pfn, pfn);
                identity += pfn - PFN_UP(last);

                last = end;
        }


> 
> Also, what happens with the p2m tree mid layers in this?  If you're
> doing page-by-page set_phys_to_machine, won't it end up allocating them
> all?  How can you optimise the "large chunks of address space are
> identity" case?

The issue here is that when this code path is called (xen_memory_setup),
the p2m_top[topidx][mididx] has been set to start_info->mfn_list[] (by
xen_build_dynamic_phys_to_machine).

Granted, some of these entries have been evicted (by the 
xen_return_unused_memory),
so the regions in the mfn_list are pock-marked with INVALID_P2M_ENTRY. For those
regions we set the PFN in the p2m_top[topidx][mididx][idx]. We do
not allocate anything during this pass.

In the the dom0_mem=max:X (or X,max:Y, where Y>X), which I neglected to test 
this
would actually try to allocate (whoops). Let me roll up a patch for this.

> 
> It would probably be cleanest to have a set_ident_phys_to_machine(start,
> end) function which can do all that.

Not sure if it is truly needed.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel