[Xen-devel] [SPAM] Re: [PATCH 02/10] xen/p2m: change p2m_missing_* to p2m_identity_*

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 02:41:23PM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 12/21/2010 01:37 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > We are going to alter how we think about P2M. Most of the
> > P2M contains MFN, and areas that are not populated are
> > considered to be "missing". Missing means that the PFN
> > is either not set for this guest (not have that much memory
> > allocated) or is under the balloon driver ownership.
> >
> > We are instead now going to think of those not populated
> > areas as "identity." Meaning that that the PFN for which
> > we would get the p2m_identity we will provide the the PFN
> > value back instead of P2M_MISSING. Essentially treating
> > those regions as PFN==MFN.
> >
> 
> This renames missing -> identity, but does it actually change the
> functionality?  Doesn't it just leave it being misnamed?  It would
> probably be better to fold in the actual identity implementation as well.

You sure? It would be a lot of changes in one patch. This patch is
a nop - so no functional changes except the name change.

Let me annotate the git tree to mention this.

> >             mid_mfn_mfn = virt_to_mfn(mid_mfn);
> > -           if (cmpxchg(top_mfn_p, missing_mfn, mid_mfn_mfn) != missing_mfn)
> > +           if (cmpxchg(top_mfn_p, identity_mfn, mid_mfn_mfn) !=
> > +               identity_mfn)
> 
> Don't wrap this.

Checkpatch.pl was unhappy without it. I can ignore this.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel