[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] XEN 4.0.1 + pv_ops Kernel + CentOS 5.5 x86_64, is there an easier way.


  • To: xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, David Gonzalez Herrera <dgonzalezh@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 11:25:21 -0800 (PST)
  • Cc:
  • Delivery-date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 11:26:15 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fToC2bqzczZlrpvaavdNEPB5t1TPmYQUaKdm9mnIxwvl9BLy6PYzGNTozscOKW0HZLmrCElKUfL5rsc5r13lL9AUk416koeKjgeRMIuv2wGY6lWUQN9LVCUGxbiLWuKcKJBGTm1f+RbwMBaH6ijAtw3UzAO50WKV1ULE5ATThZg=;
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

> I've tried compiling the Kernel from Source, I've also tried Fedora 14, which has a flaky > pv_ops Dom0 kernel which DOESN'T work at all, but none of these seem to work.

http://www.linuxtoday.com/infrastructure/2010090900235OSSV

Boris.

--- On Sun, 12/12/10, David Gonzalez Herrera <dgonzalezh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: David Gonzalez Herrera <dgonzalezh@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-users] XEN 4.0.1 + pv_ops Kernel + CentOS 5.5 x86_64, is there an easier way.
To: "xen-users" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sunday, December 12, 2010, 12:42 PM

Hi

As you may've seen from my last posts I'm struggling to get the setup on my subject line to work without flaws.

I've tried compiling the Kernel from Source, I've also tried Fedora 14, which has a flaky pv_ops Dom0 kernel which DOESN'T work at all, but none of these seem to work.

I'm a mid-time XEN user, I just love it and want to stay away from KVM  but the migration path is too rough when you want pv_ops Dom0, and all seem to be just projects, TODOs and snapshots, nothing really serious IMHO there's lots of misleading info and there are many gaps on existing howtos, I've read that SuSE has back-ported some stuff from 2.6.3.x branch into 2.6.18 but I want native and I don't want to be toying around with Debian'ish stuff in production environments.

I'd like to keep using RH like system because of their robustness and because I'm used to work with it as a RHCE.

Please, would you help me find a distro which would integrate

RH like 
XEN 4.0.1
pv_ops Dom0 kernel

I want to run telephony stuff on them and tho I kinda got my Openvox A1200P card to work 50% of the times now with xen 4.0.1 it won't work but I guess that's because I'm using Kernel 2.6.18.x with XEN 4 which is not recommended.

Any advise will be deeply appreciated.

Thank you.

---
David Gonzalez H.
DGHVoIP - OPEN SOURCE TELEPHONY SOLUTIONS
Phone Bogotá: +(57-1)289-1168
Phone Medellin: +(57-4)247-0985
Mobile: +(57)315-838-8326
MSN: david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Skype: davidgonzalezh
WEB: http://www.dghvoip.com/
Proud Linux User #294661


On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Ozan Safi <ozansafi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
Has there been any development in the OVF support for Xen?
It was in the roadmap of Xen 3.4 (http://www.xen.org/download/roadmap.html)

/Ozan

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.