[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] common time reference between domU and dom0


  • To: James Harper <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 07:19:53 +0000
  • Cc:
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 23:21:53 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=ulEgMz0DWUymIbjKCVq3uG+iI14W150PAAnzr2ZzUNJEKxbAiPAp/yDHK9onn46ggr kJYktadERn2Y2891lqCmx3CfrqGW6tVxDCk6Bj/AEuRxEET1MPfrMbf8O9rYssx5xnoB 12CMcpN2Mol6aLZY46zKCKEMbV6clXPnfAQmw=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcuYKlmfwlYiX5ejQNegrVc1bZJ6nwAEEnxi
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] common time reference between domU and dom0

System time, as exposed to guests by Xen, should be good enough.

 -- Keir


On 10/12/2010 05:23, "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I would like to be able to measure front/back ring message latency
> between a Windows DomU and Dom0. To do this I need a common time
> reference between the two, preferably with at least microsecond
> precision (latency <1us is irrelevant for my purposes). Does such a
> thing exist? A small amount of overhead in measuring this latency is
> acceptable.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> James
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.