[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 13/13] Nested Virtualization: hap-on-hap



At 17:49 +0000 on 02 Dec (1291312156), Christoph Egger wrote:
> > My comments on why p2m_flush_locked() isn't enough to reclaim an in-use
> > p2m for recycling still stand.
> 
> Can you point me to the mail in the ML archive you refer to, please?

It's the discussion at the end of this email:
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-09/msg00624.html

Cheers,

Tim.

-- 
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Principal Software Engineer, Xen Platform Team
Citrix Systems UK Ltd.  (Company #02937203, SL9 0BG)

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.