[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] applying mailing list patches


  • To: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
  • From: George Dunlap <dunlapg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:45:18 +0000
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, domiel forty-two <domiel42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:46:31 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=G0NEBTAmGGDBZfbyGycXj+nmd/9uYNlyRoxCWJL4Omx4j8E633RojExwyZvgtCQKW/ T9uBKVemy3mamIdtaUHe8q96QwHJgOFAggiLY3p4XlAjIikFG7Nye46H2TCd/GOJl/8d 0wDo5YS6a1qhmENw9AltiW19kyLptA3QZrKz0=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

...although importing them to mercurial patch queues is probably better:
 http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/MqExtension

 -George

On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Patches are usually against xen-unstable.hg -- the development branch which
> will eventually become Xen 4.1.0. You can apply them with 'patch -p1' at the
> root of xen-unstable.hg.
>
>  -- Keir
>
> On 27/11/2010 06:56, "domiel forty-two" <domiel42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> What's the procedure for applying the patches provided here.
>>
>> I've tried patching the 4.0-testing repository with Qing He's nested vmx 
>> patch
>> series from september without any success. I've also had similar problems 
>> with
>> applying a set of patches that Eddie Dong sent me in a private email.
>>
>> I'm assuming that the patches need to be applied against the 4.0.1 release
>> tag.
>>
>> I also notice that the patches seem to originate from 'hg export' however 
>> they
>> only include one '-r' argument to diff which doesn't seem correct - certainly
>> hg import --exact returns a "abort: not a Mercurial patch" error.
>>
>> I'm also assuming that the order the patches need to be applied are the order
>> in which they are tagged by name in the series, ie. patch 01/16, 02/16, etc.
>> is this a flawed assumption?
>>
>> Can anyone please tell me where I'm going wrong?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.