[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fwd: Re: [Xen-devel] Balloon driver for Linux/HVM
- To: "Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Chu Rui <ruichu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:38:51 +0800
- Delivery-date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:39:45 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=iwPlCCSWcOz2108R2L0wb/UQhCES8GWP24yndeTCHvixMSlh7kh7FR9Rj6hc+pi8Ux PT0GOT0OvY9zfTLZJ2GraW7G7/RU45lhw4nsKBbGmSgZg1CXBkPMfFdD0Ki2oIHXk7fj sxzqoHN7RGdYtUMb822rdUWbnre28j4jLM+ks=
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
Many thanks.
Currently we are using xen 4.0. Dom0 is RHEL 5.4(kernel 2.6.31-13), most of DomUs are using Windows 2003, and some of them are also RHEL 5.4.
NONE of the DomU is patched.
2010/11/22 Daniel Kiper <dkiper@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hello,
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 12:53:17AM +0800, Chu Rui wrote:
> Sorry for the misleading statements before.
> The balloon, as my point of view, has the problems as follows:
> 1. cannot deflate to a "negative" size. therefore the guest swapping will
> become a problem.
> 2. long reactive time.
> While the advantage is that it need not any guest os modification.
No problem, however could you tell me which type of system you are
using (Linux, Windows, ...), its version and exact kernel version
if it is the case ???
Daniel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
