[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] avoid numa placement of cpus with active cpupools
- To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:31:00 +0200
- Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:31:54 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: s=s1536a; d=ts.fujitsu.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-SBRSScore:X-IronPort-AV:Received:X-IronPort-AV: Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Organization: User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=VRFVmYMx+KwlkIZZRxePGgbSZrXxtw0ZNr+a7iO9kcwCy+Z/Nd2obEFL HdVU6OqVwv21gH0Hdh9ZRrxppMbpOQxCN+IZXTZxOud5qU9y+soULf7lm nCf6RcLPGx4FPDs1gO3K8Yqbs3sw0Qrzu36IDOkKxs2tD9yUbmzwLhX7a FnePk3JV9pJxoR/e9XHGq602Zx+e0d2S2rvVqJgrk3FCuxqyMo2oe0qfi hljUlbSz0NgoaSYVUpMiCKuxMwM4T;
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
On 10/27/10 18:11, Ian Jackson wrote:
Juergen Gross writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH] avoid numa placement of cpus with active
cpupools"):
When using cpupools don't pin vcpus to numa nodes as this might
conflict with the cpupool definition.
numa placement should be handled by cpupool configuration instead.
JOOI (and without looking at libxl to check) does this need a
corresponding patch for libxl ?
No, libxl doesn't include any numa related cpu placement up to now.
Juergen
--
Juergen Gross Principal Developer Operating Systems
TSP ES&S SWE OS6 Telephone: +49 (0) 89 3222 2967
Fujitsu Technology Solutions e-mail: juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Domagkstr. 28 Internet: ts.fujitsu.com
D-80807 Muenchen Company details: ts.fujitsu.com/imprint.html
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
